For the Read With Us Lounge, we spend a lot of time talking about books we love. But every now and then, an interesting question comes up: What actually makes a book good?
It sounds like a simple question, but the more you think about it, the harder it becomes to answer. Is a good book beautifully written? Does it need to move us emotionally? Should it surprise us with something we've never encountered before? Is a book better if we want to read it again or if it challenges us the first time through? Maybe the most interesting answer is that a “good” book doesn't have to succeed in just one way
Beauty of Language
Some books stay with us because of the sentences themselves. We pause over a phrase, reread a paragraph, or find ourselves thinking about a particular image days later.
Beautiful language can make an ordinary moment feel extraordinary. It can create atmosphere, reveal character, or make us notice something about the world that we hadn't noticed before. Sometimes, we love a book simply because we love being inside its prose.
But does beautiful writing automatically make a book good? Probably not. A gorgeous sentence can't necessarily rescue a story that leaves us cold.
Emotional Impact
Then there are the books that make us feel.
We may laugh, cry, become angry, feel unsettled, or recognize ourselves in a character. Sometimes a book changes our understanding of an experience we have never personally had.
Emotional impact can be powerful, but it is also deeply personal. One reader may be devastated by a novel while another barely reacts. Does that mean one reader is “right” or is the emotional experience itself part of what makes reading so subjective?
Originality
We often praise books for being original. We want ideas, characters, structures, or perspectives that feel fresh.
But originality is complicated. Very few stories are completely new. Writers are always borrowing, adapting, responding to, and reinventing what came before. Sometimes the most impressive books aren't the ones with entirely new ideas, but the ones that take familiar ideas and make us see them differently.
Perhaps originality isn't about inventing something from nothing. Perhaps it's about making something familiar feel new.
Rereadability
Here's another test: Would you read it again?
Some books are thrilling on a first read but don't necessarily call us back. Others seem to become richer each time we return to them. On a second or third reading, we notice foreshadowing, hidden details, patterns in the language, or meanings we couldn't have seen before.
But rereadability isn't the only measure of quality. Some books are difficult, painful, or exhausting, and we may be grateful we read them once without ever wanting to read them again. A book doesn't necessarily have to be comforting or enjoyable to be worthwhile.
Difficulty
Which brings us to another tricky question: Does a good book have to be difficult?
There's a temptation to equate difficulty with seriousness or intelligence. We sometimes assume that if a book takes effort to understand, it must be more valuable than one we read quickly and easily.
But reading pleasure matters, too. A book can be deceptively simple and still be profound. A straightforward story can contain enormous emotional or philosophical depth. Maybe difficulty is best understood not as a measure of quality, but as one possible kind of reading experience.
So What Makes a Book Good?
Maybe the answer depends on what we ask a book to do.
A good book might give us language we want to savor. It might make us feel something deeply. It might challenge our assumptions, introduce us to an unfamiliar perspective, or make an old idea feel new. It might reward rereading, or simply give us an unforgettable experience the first time.
And perhaps the most important thing is that “good” doesn't have to mean “universally enjoyable.”
A book can be beautifully written and not be for us. A novel can have brilliant ideas but fail to move us. A book we adore might be one that another reader finds tedious. Those differences aren't necessarily a problem. They're part of what makes a reading community interesting.
So this summer, instead of asking only Did you like it?, we can try asking a few different questions:
What did this book do well?
What did it make you feel or think about?
What, if anything, will stay with you?
Would you read it again? Why or why not?
And perhaps the best question of all:
What makes you call a book “good”?
I'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments. Bring your favorite book, your most controversial opinion, or the book you can't stop thinking about, and let's compare our definitions of “good.”
======
Thank you for your participation in the RWU Lounge. We we weren't exactly sure if our "anti-book bingo" idea would work but you have helped to make it a rousing success with your thoughtful comments and discussion, no matter what the topic was. As a small token of our appreciation, we'd love to send you a thank-you gift. If you're comfortable sharing your mailing address, please send it to me via email (highlyreasonableATgmailDOTcom) and we'll get your parting gift on its way in a bit. Thanks again; we really appreciate your commitment to our "No Rules. Just Fun!" philosophy.
Oh, Bonny. What an excellent, thoughtfully written post! Thank you. Whenever I read a book, I try to analyze it using criteria much like you've outlined today. I'm always most amazed with the books that I didn't really enjoy reading . . . but that ALSO checked my boxes for what makes a book "good." (I'm looking at you, Switzy!) I often talk about books that are "chewy" . . . and by that I mean books that have some (I guess) gristle to them . . . books that make me stop and think and appreciate and consider. I may not always LIKE them, but I can usually appreciate them.
ReplyDeleteI don't think there's a specific set of criteria that makes a book good that applies for everyone, but for me, the writing is probably the most important factors. If it's poorly written, I find it terribly distracting. I want to read writing that is so well done that I have no trouble following the story while also enjoying the quality of the writing. The books I've loved have drawn me in because I care about the characters and what happens to them, and I find that I also want to reread the books I've loved because I feel like they have much more to offer than what I got on the first read. I don't think good books have to be hard, but I'm not afraid of books that require me to think or question things. I guess I want a book that engages me emotionally and intellectually but doesn't frustrate me.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Kym... this is really an excellent post, Bonny! I have reread 2 books this summer... Whistler and John of John. Whistler was an easy reread... I simply did not want to leave Daphne and Eddie just yet. Patchett always does the people in her stories well. The characters linger long after I have finished the story. They feel real and they are not perfect. I like "likable" characters that are relatable. (I think Elizabeth Strout does this incredibly well also.) John of John would not have been a "automatic" reread but as it is the Read With Us selection for next month and it had been some time since I read it I revisited it... this time with my eyes and ears! Douglas Stuart writes so beautifully and his characters and topics are what Kym would probably call "chewy" and yet they have stayed with me. (I mean I don't think I will ever forget Mungo or Shuggie) And again this summer I read Charlotte's Web... a book I have probably read 3 dozen (or more) times over the course of my life. I mean who would not want to hang around the barn with Fern, Wilbur, Charlotte, and all their friends?
ReplyDeleteThe writing is what draws me in first. My friend Leslie and I discuss books a lot and we always talk about "beautiful writing." Sometimes the location can matter; always the characters matter. And, of course, this is different for everyone. I absolutely loved Land, but not everyone did. Everyone loved Whistler and though I thought it was very, very good, it definitely isn't my favorite book (of summer or by Patchett). Sometimes I want to be challenged to think about something. Other times I just want to be entertained. And, what makes a book good for me has certainly changed over the years. Great post Bonny!
ReplyDeleteWhat a thoughtful post, Bonny. For me, a truly great read has beautiful language and an emotional impact. These are the books that generally stick with me and give me a book hangover. I think a well written novel with profound moments and personal epiphanies that linger and make me examine how they relate to my experiences and broaden my thinking are rare and precious to me. This applies to my nonfiction choices as well as novels. I love an original story, but as you said, there really aren't that many original stories to tell. I find I generally do not enjoy reworked original stories. I don't often re-read books, so this is not something I appreciate as well as people who do that a lot. And it does not matter to me whether or not it is difficult.
ReplyDeleteI've never given much thought about why some books are page turners and others aren't. Some of the books I love the most have absolutely nothing going on plot wise. When I was a kid I devoured my mother's and grandmother's cookbooks for all the headnotes.. Now I find myself loving books with lots of kitchen and food references. Give me a steaming kettle in a cozy kitchen and I'm happy. I loved The Shining because a lot of it took place in a walk-in refrigerator. I don't remember much about the ghosts but I do remember the giant cans of peaches.
ReplyDeleteFood writing and cookbooks are almost always good, especially older cookbooks. I might have to rewatch The Shining sometime!
DeleteI think what makes a book good changes for me with the book, what's going on in my life while reading it and if I'm stressed at work. Some books start slow and I'm like this is going to be a chore but then by the time I get to the end, something changes for me and I'm loving it. Then some are just good all the way through and I'm sorry to see them end.
ReplyDeleteYou make a good point! I neglected to consider the reader's mood or what is going on in their lives, but I know that is certainly a factor for me.
Delete