... is a great day to Vote by Mail.
It's "just" the primary, but it's still important and I hope it actually gets counted!
Striving to be highly reasonable, even in the face of unreasonableness. Reading, knitting, and some alcohol may help.
... is a great day to Vote by Mail.
I read three books this week, so I decided to post all the reviews together today. Edited to add: It turns out that I actually finished four but didn't want to ruin the alliteration of Three on Thursday.
Thomas’s prose is
undeniably sharp and direct. There’s a spareness to her writing that I
appreciated; she wastes no words, and many passages carry a kind of
understated honesty. Her reflections on long-term friendship offer
glimpses of something deep and sustaining, even when the rest of life
feels uncertain or diminished.
That said, the fragmented
structure, while stylistically interesting, made it difficult to fully
engage. The vignettes often felt more like impressions than
explorations, and I found myself wanting more depth and more cohesion.
While there are moments of insight, they felt fleeting, and I struggled
to come away feeling truly enlightened, moved, or even particularly
educated, which are qualities I tend to look for in a memoir.
Ultimately,
this is a book that seems more about sitting with life as it is rather
than drawing meaning from it. For some readers, that may be enough. For
me, it felt a bit too slight to leave a lasting impression.
This memoir centers
on the aftermath of her husband’s traumatic brain injury, and the life
Thomas builds in response to that devastating shift. While her signature
style is still present, with brief sections and a somewhat
impressionistic structure, it felt more cohesive here. Her emotions are
written more clearly, and I was better able to follow the arc of her
experience, from shock and guilt to a kind of fragile stability.
Thomas’s
prose remains spare and direct, which works well for the subject
matter. There are moments of genuine insight, particularly in how she
grapples with what it means to remain connected to someone who is, in
many ways, no longer the person you knew. I also appreciated that I did
learn something from this memoir, about care giving, adaptation, and the
ways people continue living after unimaginable disruption. That’s
something I tend to look for in memoir, and this book delivered more of
it than her later one.
Dogs, as the title suggests, play a
central role here, not just as companions, but as emotional anchors.
Thomas’s deep affection for them is evident, and they help shape the
quieter, rebuilt life she describes. It’s striking, too, that despite
everything, she manages to carve out a decent, even meaningful life.
Still,
while I admired much of what this book was doing, it didn’t fully land
for me on an emotional level. The distance created by the fragmented
style sometimes kept me from feeling as immersed as I wanted to be. I
gave it 3.5 stars, but couldn’t quite round up.
Maxim Loskutoff’s Old King is a quiet,
unsettling novel that lingers in the spaces between men, between
ideologies, and between the myth of the American frontier and its
unraveling. Set against the rugged backdrop of Lincoln, Montana, the
story follows Duane Oshun as he runs away from a divorce in Salt Lake
City and stumbles into a logging community and the orbit of a reclusive
neighbor, Ted Kaczynski, along with some other reclusive and stubborn
men. There are few women in this book, and they are definitely secondary
characters.
I’ve always had some degree of interest in
Kaczynski, with my own connection to Lincoln through having a cabin
there. That familiarity made this novel feel quite grounded. Loskutoff
captures the place with an authenticity that’s hard to fake, the rhythms
of the town, the isolation, the quiet tensions simmering beneath
everyday interactions. Lincoln is more than just a setting; it’s a force
that shapes these men and their choices.
What makes Old King
particularly compelling is that it isn’t really about Kaczynski, at
least not in the way one might expect. Instead, it’s about the
intersection of several lives of along Stemple Pass Road, men who circle
one another, sometimes barely aware of the impact they’re having. Their
connections are loose, almost accidental, yet deeply consequential.
Loskutoff explores how proximity alone can bind people together, for
better or (more often) worse.
The author's portrayal of Kaczynski
is especially fascinating, neither sensationalized nor excused, but
rendered as one thread in a larger tapestry of disillusionment,
masculinity, and environmental grief. The “Old King” itself, the ancient
Douglas fir, stands as a powerful symbol of what’s being lost, and of
the competing values that drive these men toward conflict.
This
is not an easy or uplifting read. There’s a quiet inevitability to the
tragedy that unfolds, and it’s striking how none of these men emerge
unscathed. Their lives, shaped by isolation, stubbornness, and a kind of
muted longing, seem destined to collide in ways that can only end
badly. Still, Old King is a deeply rewarding novel, thoughtful,
atmospheric, and sharply observant. It asks difficult questions about
progress, connection, and the stories we tell ourselves about
independence. Three and a half stars rounded up.
Yesteryear is an ambitious, unsettling debut that’s at its best when it leans into its sharp social critique, even if it occasionally stumbles under the weight of its own ideas.
The premise was irresistible to me: a carefully curated “tradwife” influencer suddenly forced to live the actual reality of early 19th-century life. Burke wastes no time stripping away Natalie’s glossy, performative existence and replacing it with something brutal, filthy, and deeply disorienting. The contrast between the Instagram fantasy and the physical toll of survival is vividly rendered, and often genuinely disturbing. There’s a visceral quality to these sections that kept me turning pages.
What are you making this Tax Day in April?
I've had a bunch of these little orchids over the years, but I'm down to just two of them. I've never successfully rebloomed any of them ... until now!
A quiet thing at first,
no louder than a breath,
kindness passing hand to hand
like a small, steady flame.
Respect grows in its shadow,
roots threading under borders,
lifting what was hardened
into something we can feel.
Hope arrives without spectacle,
just a door left open,
a chair pulled close,
a voice that chooses truth.
And peace,
not distant, not impossible,
but here, in the fragile work
of seeing one another whole.
Sincerely and with love,
A Global Citizen In Search of Peace
====
Wishing you a very peaceful weekend.
I’m happy to join Kat and the Unravelers today, with a bit of unraveling due to my own carelessness, but I'm back on track now.
I have been doing six teeth between eyelet rows, but I was happily knitting along when I noticed that I had only done five teeth between the last two eyelet rows. I tried telling myself that nobody would notice while I was wearing it, but I would know. And I knew it would bug me, so I ripped out a bunch, made sure to knit six teeth before I did the eyelet row, and then kept going. I'm just a little bit past where I was last week, but I know I'll be happier in the long run.
You might have remembered that April is Poetry Month, that month where several of us celebrated by sharing poems we had found. Sometimes these were centered around an author or a theme, sometimes they were just poems that we loved. We were careful to provide citations, and I (mistakenly) thought this meant we were respecting the author's copyright. It became clear that if we were posting poetry written by someone else, then that is against copyright law unless the work is in the public domain or you have permission. Using small excerpts (~ two lines) from other poets' work may be allowed under "fair use," but reproducing entire poems requires permission.
None of us wanted to be stealing poetry, so despite the fact that our intentions were good (solely to share and enjoy poetry), we couldn't figure a way around this. We decided it was better to not to do our usual celebration of Poetry Month, which saddened many of us, but sometimes you just have to be a grownup and do the right thing.
But ... publishing your own poetry on a personal blog is not against copyright law, so that's what I'm doing today. I read an article about Zip Odes and was intrigued. Invented in 2015, the Zip Ode is a five-line poem about where you live, written in the form of your zip code. Write the numbers of your zip code down the left-hand side of the page. Each number determines the number of words in that line. If you have a zero in your zip code, that line is a wild card! You can leave it blank, insert an emoji or symbol, or use any number of words between 1 and 9.
Lucky me! My zip code is 08822, so I get a wild card line, along with two lines with eight words. I wrote my own Zip Ode, focusing on some of the things I love about this area.
Today I'm taking my virtual fountain pen in hand to write a few Friday letters. I've been to the grocery store, come across something unique and interesting, and had some reactions. You might, too.
Dear Utrecht Fish People,
I can't thank you enough for your fish doorbell! There is just something so undeniably fun about staring at an underwater camera, hoping to see a fish so I can ring the doorbell. I've enjoyed myself quite a bit, sitting with my knitting, waiting, and watching in hopes of letting a fish through on their journey to spawn. It would be a real accomplishment if you could teach the fish to ring the doorbell themselves, but until that happens, I'm happy to help.
Sincerely,
A fish-watching friend
======
Last week it was Protein Pop-Tarts, this week it's some sort of meta Pop-Tart flavored Peeps? I'll admit that I was a little bit tempted to buy a box just so I could see how bad they tasted, but I'm fairly sure they are just as bad as I'm imagining.
I would also like to voice my objections over the Dr. Pepper flavor. Dr. Pepper is my favorite soda and it should not be tarnished by using it as some sort of marketing gimmick to sell your chick-shaped blobs of marshmallow. But if I do happen to see some of these at half price after Easter, I may not be able to resist. (But only if they're half price!)
A Dr. Pepper lover who only imbibes in liquid form
======
I wish you a wonderful weekend, a Happy Passover or Happy Easter if you celebrate either one, and maybe a handful of just the good-tasting jellybeans!
I’m happy to join Kat and the Unravelers today with a Hitchhiker photo that looks much the same as last week, but if I had remembered to take a photo while it was still light out, you might be able to spy 9 more teeth.
I finished two books this week; one was a decent read and one was spectacular. Set in 1977 suburban Rochester, Lake Effect
explores a moment of restlessness that ripples through two families,
beginning with Nina’s impulsive affair and radiating outward into her
daughter Clara’s life for years to come. Sweeney is at her best when she
captures the quiet dissatisfaction of adulthood and the way a single
choice can fracture a family’s sense of stability. The writing is
observant and often wry, especially in its portrayal of marriage,
longing, and the stories people tell themselves to justify their
actions.
But this is also a book where nearly everyone behaves
badly, and not always in ways that feel illuminating. The adults make
reckless, self-absorbed choices, but what’s more frustrating is how
those patterns echo into the next generation. Clara, as a grown woman,
remains stuck in the emotional wake of her mother’s decisions, yet she,
too, makes choices that are difficult to sympathize with. Instead of
deepening the novel’s themes, this generational mirroring sometimes
makes the story feel repetitive rather than revelatory.
The title
is a strong and fitting metaphor. A lake effect storm, when cold air
sweeps over warmer water and produces sudden, intense snowfall,
perfectly captures the emotional climate of the book. Small shifts in
temperature lead to outsized, unexpected consequences, and Sweeney seems
interested in how quickly lives can be altered by moments of desire or
impulsivity. Still, like those storms, the impact here can feel more
blustery than transformative.
In the end, Lake Effect has
moments of insight and emotional truth, but it didn’t fully cohere for
me. It was kind of a fun read for me to see just how badly the
characters could behave, but not one that lingered much past the last
page for me. This was three stars for me.
I’ll admit it: I wasn’t entirely sure I wanted
to leave Olive Kitteridge behind. There’s something about Olive, her
sharp edges, her loneliness, her unexpected tenderness, that lingers
long after the last page. So when I opened The Things We Never Say, I did so with a tiny bit of reluctance, unsure if I was ready to trade her in for Strout's newest character.
But Elizabeth Strout knows exactly what she’s doing.
Artie
Dam is, in many ways, the opposite of Olive, gentler, quieter, more
inwardly unsettled, but he is every bit as real. He’s a good man, simply
trying to live in a world that often feels confusing and off-kilter.
Strout captures his inner life with such precision that his questions,
about marriage, about how little we truly know even the people we love,
and about truth and the things we never say are ones that felt much like
questions I've asked myself.
And that’s the magic here: nothing
“big” needs to happen for everything to feel enormous. A single
revelation ripples outward, forcing Artie (and the reader) to reconsider
what a life is made of, what we say, what we don’t, and what it costs
to keep certain truths buried.
What sets Strout apart, too, is
her ability to write about the current political and cultural climate
with honesty and restraint. She doesn’t grandstand or simplify; instead,
she lets it seep naturally into her characters’ lives, the way it does
in ours, through unease, conversation, silence, sometimes quiet
division, and being appalled and horrified daily. It’s one of the few
portrayals in fiction that has actually felt true. As always, her prose
is deceptively simple, clean, precise, and deeply compassionate. She
sees her characters clearly, flaws and all, and loves them anyway. And
because she does, we do, too.
There’s a passing reference to
Olive Kitteridge that made me inordinately happy, one of those small,
perfect moments that reminds you all of Strout’s characters exist in the
same emotional universe. It felt like running into an old friend when
you least expect it.
By the end, I wasn’t missing Olive anymore
(well, not quite as much). Artie Dam had taken his place beside her as
another beautifully drawn, fully human character trying to make sense of
things that don’t always make sense.
Five stars for a novel that
feels both intimate and expansive, and for a writer who continues to
illuminate the quiet, complicated truths of being alive.
Thank you to Edelweiss and Random House for providing me with a copy of this book. It will be published on May 5, 2026.
What are you making and reading this April Fool's Day?