Friday, October 24, 2025

Banned Books

Every year when my library puts up its Banned Books display, I can’t resist spending a little extra time browsing. There’s something both funny and thought-provoking about seeing which titles have landed on that list, and, in many cases, why.

This year, a few of the choices made me laugh out loud. Right there among the “dangerous” and “controversial” works were Bad Kitty and Captain Underpants. Really? Those mischievous cats and underwear-clad superheroes are what we’re worried about corrupting young minds?

When my sons were growing up in the 1990s, Captain Underpants books were a fixture in our household. They made the boys laugh, and, truth be told, they made me laugh, too. The idea that they’re banned for “offensive language,” being “unsuited for their age group,” or “encouraging disruptive behavior” is almost too funny to me. My kids were perfectly capable of coming up with their own disruptive behavior without any help from a cartoon character in his underwear.

As for Bad Kitty, it turns out some of the books have been challenged because they include a lesbian couple and use symbolic expletives (those cartoon-style symbols like @#$%! that suggest a swear word without actually saying one). Hardly scandalous, in my opinion, and certainly not something worth banning.

I ended up checking out two books from the display that I’d read before: Year of Wonders by Geraldine Brooks and The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon. I had to look up why they’d been banned or challenged, too, themes of witchcraft, madness, and repressed sexuality for the first, and profanity and atheism for the second. It made me realize how easily books can be misunderstood or reduced to a single “offensive” element, when what they actually offer is depth, empathy, and perspective.
 
 
I completely support the idea that parents should decide what they feel is appropriate for their own children. That’s a personal and important responsibility. But I draw the line when someone tries to make that decision for everyone else’s children, too. One family’s comfort zone shouldn’t define another’s reading list.

Banned Books Week (it was October 5 -11 this year) is a good reminder of why libraries matter so much; they should be able to offer everyone the freedom to explore ideas, to question, to laugh, and to learn. Standing in front of that display each year, I’m grateful for the librarians who work hard to ensure those stories stay on the shelves, waiting for curious readers to discover them all over again. Checking out the books that make people uncomfortable are often the ones most worth reading.

6 comments:

  1. My big Grands love Captain Underpants. Hopefully all this banned books nonsense will create more interest than ever in reading. I know I went out of my way as a kid to get my hands on books I was told not to read.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I remember Colin reading and laughing about Captain Underpants. Hard to believe it's on the banned list!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Like your house, Captain Underpants was a part of our house as well! (and a very delightful one!) I had never heard of Bad Kitty (but I believe having Bad Kitty for President would be a gigantic improvement over the clown show we have currently!) I read and loved both the Brooks and Haddon novels... and I have just this to say about banned books. If you don't like a book, don't read it. Period. What do I think about parental control over children's books? Well, my response is don't do that either. Perhaps try reading the book together and discussing what is discomforting to you and why. I believe that is a far better conversation to have than banning books.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh good grief! I think the people who want to ban books are just too lazy to be good parents. Kids will learn about the stuff they want to keep from them anyway, so why not take books with difficult subjects as an opportunity to talk about them and learn from them? I'm convinced that a lot of people haven't actually read the books they want to ban, anyway.

    Only once did my parents (well, my mother) try to keep me from reading a book -- it was The Handmaid's Tale, because she thought it was too mature for me. And of course I read it anyway, probably because she said she didn't want me to read it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't know how I would've gotten my reluctant-reader (Brian) to read anything if it hadn't been for Captain Underpants!!! Banning books . . . has always been one of my biggest pet peeves (although I'll admit . . . my list of "pet peeves" is growing longer every day . . . ). "Controlling" and monitoring the reading of one's own children is part of parenting. But it is never appropriate to control or monitor the reading of OTHER PEOPLE's children.

    I have an old Banned Books button from years ago on my bulletin board (looking at it right now, in fact). It says "Think for yourself and let others do the same." I can't agree MORE.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh my word! I have tried to understand why people want to ban books, and I think it might be about power. Doesn't everything boil down to money and power these days? It is just another thing that makes me sad for our country. Year of Wonders was one of my favorite books years ago. I think it had a lot to say to those who took the time to read it and learn from it. You are correct, although it is hard to believe, that librarians are to be lauded for holding the line against this nonsense. But who ever thought they would have to? A recent article in the Atlantic alluded to this being the golden age of stupidity. Something to think about. Thanks for yesterday, Bonny. One of the things I miss most about John is intelligent , open-minded conversation, and I always have it with you.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for visiting and taking the time to comment! :-)