Friday, March 7, 2025

Humankind: Are Humans Kind?

Last week when I was complaining about Jeff Bezos and writing about applesauce and reading more poetry, a kind anonymous commenter left me an intriguing comment: 

"Hi Bonny,

Long time reader but lurker. Love your book reviews and your hitchikers, although I am yet to start one of my own.

May I recommend the book "Humankind", by Rutger Bregman, as an excellent antidote (rather than a temporary escape) to the current state of the world?"

I replied:

"Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment and the book recommendation. I'm heading to a used bookstore tomorrow to look for some Ted Kooser poetry books, but I've just borrowed Humankind from my library and will start listening to it tonight. I could surely use an antidote to the current state of things and I'm hopeful that this book might provide it. The subtitle (A Hopeful History) sounds promising!"

And then she replied with an even more thoughtful comment:

"Thank you for taking the time to reply to an anonymous comment so kindly.

I have been thinking over my wording and I think rather than antidote, maybe a better description of the effect of "Humankind" is that it has made a permanent change in my state of mind; it is easier to take the news with a grain of salt sometimes, ignore it without guilt when I need to, and find a place of mental comfort. It has made it much easier to be hopeful about the future."

I will always read and consider kind, helpful, and thoughtful comments, especially those that contain book recommendations. This was especially nice, since most of the previous anonymous comments I've gotten have called me a crazy Democrat, berated me for talking about politics, and telling me I need to stick to knitting. This was a welcome change!


So I did read the recommended book and I've thought about it for a couple of days. I'm sharing my review here in case some of you might also be interested in a hopeful book.

Humankind by Rutger Bregman is an engaging and optimistic read that challenges the notion that humans are fundamentally selfish or cruel. The book is filled with fascinating anecdotes—from real-life Lord of the Flies scenarios to historical acts of kindness—but it lacks a strong foundation in scientific studies to back up its central claim: that “most people, deep down, are pretty decent.”

One of the book’s big weaknesses for me is that Bregman never clearly defines what it means to be “pretty decent.” Does this mean we should expect people to be kind and helpful in most situations? Or simply that they have the capacity for decency under the right conditions? Without a more concrete definition, his argument feels slippery.

The author does discuss the Holocaust as evidence of the human capacity for evil, and argues that power, influence, and survival play a bigger role than a lust for violence in the decisions people make. He suggests that social conformity and camaraderie between soldiers may explain the Holocaust, but the Holocaust was just too big and beyond horrendous to be explained simply by wanting to conform. Bregman thinks that the idea that humans are inherently selfish may have created a self-fulfilling prophecy. These all seem to be a matter of degrees, and I think that power influence, survival, and a rather large capacity for evil and cruelty all played a part in the Holocaust.

While I appreciated the book’s hopeful perspective—especially in an era where cynicism, selfishness, and just plain cruelty often dominate—some real-world events have made me question his thesis. If more than half of people in the US vehemently resisted something as straightforward as mask mandates during COVID-19, can we really say that “most people” are fundamentally good? It seems more accurate to say that some people are decent some of the time.

That said, Humankind offers a much-needed dose of optimism, and Bregman is a gifted storyteller. If you’re looking for an uplifting perspective on human nature (even if it’s a bit idealistic), this book is worth a read. Just don’t expect a deeply scientific or airtight case for its claims. Three and a half stars rounded up.

And because it's Friday at the end of a long week and this post only has one picture of a book cover, here are a couple of photos of adorable Valais Blacknose sheep. 

 

I hope you have a wonderful weekend!

15 comments:

  1. You get more thoughtful anonymous comments than I do -- mine are usually excuses for links to other sites or, in the case of my most recent one, just the word "die!" over and over.

    I'm of two minds when it comes to human nature. I think we all have the capacity to be kind, but we live in a society where it's not nurtured because being kind doesn't help you make more money or achieve more. (So I guess you could say I blame capitalism!) Countries with a more communal society fared much better during the pandemic because there was an inherent care for others. I'm not ready to give up on this country, but I think it's going to take a lot of active effort to encourage kindness and care.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What a nice anonymous comment for a change...like Sarah, my anonymous comments are usually links to other things. The book does seem rather idealistic, but perhaps that's exactly what is needed right now? Love those black faced sheep - they are adorable!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I read that book about a year ago at my son's suggestion, because world events. I agree with your assessment that it is a bit more simplistic than I hoped. But it's a good reminder to evaluate where you get your information. Too many "headlines" and "breaking news" are just click bait.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your anonymous commenter was most delightful! I have not read this book but I like your thoughts on it ( and I think you are one of the kindest people I know! ) When I think of decent, kind people... Fred Rogers comes to mind. Inherent kindness is a rare quality and I believe Mr. Rogers was overflowing with it. Padraig O'Tuama is another inherently kind person... he does everything he can to increase kindness and I really look forward to his weekly Substack letter.

    But I think the kindest thing of all is sharing those adorable sheep! They win the post!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you. I needed that sheep cleanse. My doom scrolling has gotten out of hand this week. I was lucky enough to see some of those sheep at the MDSW one year and they don't even look real when they are right in front of you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm usually good about limiting my exposure to the news but I've slipped this week. I think I'll gaze at those adorable sheep a little longer...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Those sheep! I had never heard of them, and now I want one! I don't think that most of us are inherently kind. I think we all have "tendencies" that are magnified via situational or dispositional influences. I also believe that some people just lack a conscience or empathy for others, whether it is from chemical or structural brain issues. And then there is ignorance, willful or not, that plays into your mask example. It is ignorantly selfish to refuse to wear a mask when it is warranted. All that to say that I agree with you, it is a very complex issue. I do believe that most people are kinder when they are treated with kindness, and that is why I try to be kind to everyone unless given reason not to be. And to end on a kinder note, Bonny, thank you for the sheep. You made me smile, stimulated my curiosity, and made me remember how kind you can be. :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Those sheep seem pretty decent ... and most definitely smile-inducing - thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  9. lol the sheep!! I like to believe in the kindness of others and I think I see it when I am looking for it. What an interesting book.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I love the sheep. I had to look twice to see if they were stuffed animals or real animals. The book sounds interesting and kudos to you for reading and reviewing it. To power, influence, and survival, I would add fear as an underlying motive for many cruel evil actions. That being said, I think human behavior is complex and often we behave with paradox.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Those sheep are adorable and don't even look real! Thanks for the book review. I'll keep it in mind should I need an antidote to my terrible thoughts about people.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hi Bonny,

    Thank you for this review of the book I recommended. The book was a recent finish when I commented on your blog, and your review has crystallised a few things for me; I think your star rating is representative.

    The first is the lack of evidence. I agree - This was a niggle in the back of my head the whole way through reading that i couldn't put words to.
    Conclusions about the Holocaust were naive at best, and captured what I think is the key failing of the book, which is that naivety; it doesn't address, or chooses not to address, how people are influenced by the information and opinions they are exposed to, and how strongly they absorb those opinions., nor how difficult it is for a human being to fundamentally change it's viewpoint. Education is a big factor.

    However, the book has still left me less terrified about the future, for my kids, and grandkids. Dont get me wrong, i am still scared, but I am able to more easily get myself out of the paralysing fear. I think for two reasons. The point (sometimes laboured) that negative/sensational news sells better, so we are essentially living in a disaster prediction soundbox. Receding from the news as necessary withour guilt has been helpful. The second thing it did was pulled me back to look at the bigger picture, and from an optimistic perspective. History is cyclical, and written by the winners. So when we read about how terrible things have been at various points in history, we are not hearing about the day to day, and the day to day is governed, generally by small communities and kindnesses (and various annoyances). People.really do band together to look after each other when it is bad, and however bad things get, it won't last forever. I know this is a simplistic view and there is far more nuance to it, but I think it captures the essence of what I feel about the book, and this is long enough already!

    Thanks again for the review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the recommendation! Although I was looking for more data, the book did show me that reading the bare minimum of news is really the best idea. I haven't checked it at all for two days and am trying to be present in my immediate surroundings instead of "living in the news". It's been helpful but we've still got a long way to go.
      P.S. I love the sheep, too!

      Delete
  13. Also those sheep are absolutely brilliant. Made my dsy!

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for visiting and taking the time to comment! :-)